Jonathan Wilkinson: the Minister of Greenwash

After working for ExxonMobil and Shell, it looks like his job now is to grow Canada’s oil sands

After the 2019 federal election, Alberta premier Jason Kenney laid out his demands for Ottawa. He wanted Environment Minister Catherine McKenna, whom he called “anti-pipeline,” replaced with someone the oil companies could trust.

Prime Minister Trudeau tapped North Vancouver MP Jonathan Wilkinson, a former Saskatchewan bureaucrat and CEO of a company that partnered with ExxonMobil and Shell to develop gas recovery systems for refineries.

Now it seems Wilkinson’s job is to gaslight the public on oil sands expansion.

Since his appointment as Minister of Environment and Climate Change, Wilkinson has embarked on a media blitz to promote the taxpayer-funded Trans Mountain expansion, which would export crude oil via hundreds of tankers a year.

“There’s no inconsistency between ensuring that people have access to sell oil and gas products in the short term, while we go through the energy transition, and fighting climate change,” the minister intoned on CBC radio. “There’s absolutely no conflict.”

If Wilkinson were serious about fighting climate change, he would take a stand against fossil fuel expansion. Instead, he’s poised to approve an oil sands mine that would pump over a quarter-million barrels of bitumen into new pipelines.

Then and now

It was a warm fall evening in 2015. The church was packed. Candidates at the North Vancouver debate were joined on stage by celebrated climate change and policy experts Kathryn Harrison, Simon Donner and Nancy Olewiler. In the traditionally Conservative federal riding of North Vancouver, the mood had shifted dramatically in the leadup to the 2015 election.

Looming large in the church sanctuary that night was the controversial Kinder Morgan pipeline expansion. The project would bring a seven-fold increase in tanker traffic: huge Aframax tankers that would barely fit under the Ironworkers Memorial Bridge, carrying diluted bitumen past the shores of the North Shore riding and its newly revitalized residential waterfront.

It was the first time many locals had heard from Jonathan Wilkinson, and he made an impression. His twenty years in “clean tech”, his overarching concern about climate change leading him to seek public office — he was talking the talk, and the crowd ate it up.

For folks in the pews at St. Andrews that October night, Wilkinson’s mention of “the transition” was music to their ears, conjuring images of wind farms and solar panels. Wilkinson the climate warrior, who had gone to battle first in the corporate sector, now turning to government as an even more effective way to advance his agenda.

“The world is going to be moving to a lower-carbon economy,” Wilkinson said over and over that fall. And while talking to the local Dogwood team at a meeting in November 2015: “It’s important to determine which sectors will be the new drivers for growth as fossil fuels recede in value. Our job includes how to create strategies and encourage new sectors for Canada’s economic future.”

Decades in ‘clean tech’

Before entering politics, Wilkinson held executive positions at QuestAir, Nexterra and BioteQ over a period of 16 years. At QuestAir, a major focus of the business was hydrogen recovery for oil refineries. As Exxon documents explain, QuestAir’s technology helped the global oil giant save money and expand production.

“We regard our joint development agreements with ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company and Shell Hydrogen and our worldwide network of existing customers as validation of our plans for the future,” CEO Jonathan Wilkinson said after taking the company public in 2004.

The same media release states: “QuestAir management believes that the principal drivers of this growth in refinery hydrogen demand will be: an overall increase in worldwide oil production; regulations requiring lower amounts of sulphur in diesel fuel; and increased consumption of ‘heavy’ low quality crude oil.” They got that right.

Fast-forward to December 2019, and Wilkinson still sounds bullish about Alberta’s heavy oil industry.

“Over the next number of decades, people are going to continue to consume oil and gas,” the environment minister told CBC. “And so for Canada, it’s important that the folks that produce these goods get full value for their products.” Translation: more pipelines.

Wilkinson’s real plan?

In the frenzy to defeat Stephen Harper in 2015, Wilkinson rode the red wave into power in his riding, buoyed by the support of hopeful climate voters looking for a hero. But the honeymoon was soon over. Talk of Canada moving to a low-carbon economy soon took a backseat to repetitive mansplaining about how the Kinder Morgan expansion was in the national interest.

Dogwood supporters in North Vancouver were outraged when the federal government bought out the pipeline’s Texas owners. Wilkinson’s government sent billionaire Rich Kinder back to Houston with $4.4 billion of public money in his pocket, while locals grappled with a growing affordability crisis.

Wilkinson is now in charge of Canada’s climate plan, ranked among the weakest in the G20. With emissions still rising, the global oil and gas sector plans new extraction projects totalling $1.4 trillion USD in the next five years. 85 per cent of that expansion would happen in the U.S. and Canada.

So what’s the minister’s actual climate plan?

Rather than halting fossil fuel expansion, he wants to double down on ‘clean tech’. As the Canadian Press reports, “Wilkinson said the forthcoming plan will lean heavily on developing clean technology to reduce the emissions from oil and gas production”.

The idea is to rely on experimental and future technologies to reduce the ‘intensity’ of fossil fuel extraction, while producing more and more crude oil.

It’s called greenwashing, and Jonathan Wilkinson has been doing it for years.

19 Responses to “Jonathan Wilkinson: the Minister of Greenwash”

  1. David Anderson says:

    How can we stop this man and the Liberal government from this insanity? We cannot vote them out. They were just voted in. But what they are about to do is NOT what the public wanted. I feat that the only way to even slow down the building of more oil capacity in this destructive direction is in a general strike or something on that scale. I fear for my grandchildren who are already ten years old. Johathan Wilkinson is one of the walking dead. I feel terrorized by him.

  2. Jane Kilthei says:

    Great to have this background on Wilkinson. And the word “mansplaining” under “Wilkinson’s real plan?” is incorrectly used. Mansplaining is when a man explains something true to women who already know more than he does about it, may have just explained more clearly only moments before, and in which the women present are usually more expert and qualified to comment on – see Rebecca Solnit’s book “Men Explain Things to Me”. In this case Wilkinson saying “the Kinder Morgan expansion was in the national interest” is simply an outright fabrication in which he conflates the national interest with the oil industry’s interest.

  3. Erich Baumann says:

    It sounds like Wilkinson is going to be more of an hindrance than a help to carry out the liberal platform and the throne speech.

  4. ron wilton says:

    Lieberal strategy-campaign on the left, get elected, rule on the right.

  5. Tom Russell says:

    (Mary Russell this morning); To have Wilkinson who worships Big Oil in charge of the Environment, appears to be the beginning of the end of our beautiful world. It has been said over and over—we have only a few years to bring unstoppable global warming DOWN– yet this excuse of a man is setting up to make saving our world impossible. His fixation on Big Oil expansion does not go with a world worth having. So give the heave-ho to Wilkinson and his oily mind, and do the right thing—-whatever it is that will NOT advance global warming that already hangs over our world like a drawn sword. Wilkinson’s fixation on Big Oil and his muddling of the facts do not belong to a future worth having for our children and this World incredible in it perfection of being.


  7. Kevin Santo says:

    Does Teck have a partner for starting construction of the Frontier mine? Such a project will be a multi-billion dollar effort and I’m not sure that Teck has the resources to do this. Does anyone else know anything about this?

  8. Cheryl Cameron says:

    You’re absolutely correct Jane – thank you for the correction!

  9. Iaia says:

    Of course, the ultimate brain and whitewash behind it all is “Honorable” PM Trudeau. Who on earth would appoint a former CEO of a company partnering with ExxonMobil and Shell to develop gas recovery systems for refineries as Minister of the Environment!!! That is where the problem lies… and in our backward First Past the Post electoral system..

  10. David Zakus says:

    Right on David. What a betrayal by the government.

  11. Linda Hass says:

    It is revolting, sickening and depressing to read more about the plans of this man who is obviously right in the pocket of Mr. Kenny. How can they possibly justify their plans. The whole world is in trouble, and now Canada is a big part of it. I am embarrassed to think that my country is putting dollars ahead of planning for a future where electricity is going to be most important. But hey, what’s the loss of a few hundred more acres when there is money to be made! Shame on everyone involved in this sham.

  12. Douglas Jackson says:

    “To the benefit of Canada”? Based on what facts and figures? The federal government has yet to provide any cost vs profit analyses on the TMX and considering the value of bitumen in the market place and the costs to get it there (not including the detrimental costs of burning it) the “projected” TEN BILLION DOLLAR pipe-dream will have to place approximately thirteen billion gallons of bitumen into the atmosphere IF the prices remain stable at approximately 38.00 a barrel. Teck Frontier would increase this to how many barrels? 

    To estimate profitability ALL REAL WORLD costs have to be figured in but the Federal Liberal party doesn’t seem very keen on releasing any financial projections for their pipe-dream other than to repeat, ad nauseam, that this country will somehow benefit from flooding the world with billions of gallons of a low grade, resource-intensive fossil fuel that is destined to be burned in Asian power plants. 

    Canadian governments are acting like we somehow have a separate atmosphere from the rest of the planet and burning LNG and tar sands crude is better than burning coal, which may be true but does not justify climate killing policies that result in the same final outcome. 

    I hate to believe that any Canadian voter buys into any government rhetoric these days. Half-truths, incomplete information concerning obvious bias and misplaced loyalties to oil concerns combined with snappy slogans may convince some naive, apathetic Canadian voters that all is well in La La Land but we are not all as stupid nor as apathetic as they believe we are.      

    As far as Alberta’s whining premier Jason Kenney is concerned, if he had even the slightest business acumen he would move his province forward with sustainable innovation instead of clutching onto a lame horse in a race to the bottom of the pile. 

    As far as BC Premier John Horgan is concerned, I would be very pleased to see his government stop spending countless taxpayer dollars, just like all past BC governments have, on their pet slogan “Super Natural British Columbia” while executing the exact same slash and burn policies throughout this province that the Liberal used as their go-to game plan. BC is starting to resemble more of an industrial wasteland than a “Super Natural” anything. .

    As far as the PM and his Liberal Party hacks are concerned,  they can continue to expect different results from the same actions until doomsday is upon us all…which is the definition of insane, enough said.           

    What is the greatest threat to a sustainable future? My money is on backward thinking politicos that are very good at talking it up but do not have the backbone to walk the walk.

  13. Even Teck itself says they may never build the project. By their own financials oil prices are assumed to be “in excess of $95 per barrel” for most of the project period, from 2026-2066, for the project to be viable.

  14. Robin the Bemused says:

    Oh! congratulations, on the excellent mansplaining about “mansplaining”.

  15. Ruth Pickering says:

    My guess is the Federal Government through some mechanism in the Infrastructure Bank.

  16. Greg says:

    The Liberals aren’t a green party or leaders on issues involving energy and the environment. They are a party with similar goals the Conservatives, but try to come across as environmentally responsible. If you want a party that takes climate change seriously and who promotes a 21st century energy plan based on a transition to the clean tech economy then vote in more Green MP’s next time!

  17. pensive72 says:

    I agree with you 100%. This wolf in sheep”s clothing is one the latest Liberal’s lies. The 2020 Liberals are worse than they have ever been

  18. pensive72 says:

    Trudeau has to go!

  19. Peter Puhacz says:

    Hon. Jonathan Wilkinson, MP
    310 Esplanade E #201, North Vancouver, BC V7M 2G3

    February, 10, 2020

    Re; Frontier Project, Alberta,

    Dear Sir,
    here is my win/win proposition;
    to grant the permit under condition;
    first Teck has to get credit producing clean electrical energy in Alberta, and THEN
    allowed to exploit tar sands to the amount earned credit.
    hereby I am proposing; to produce clean electrical energy;
    1. to build pumped storage plants, and
    2. use my invention ( to pump water from lower to upper reservoir.
    more details about the pumped storage plants can be found on

    Peter Puhacz 604-512-9570
    1113 – 7210 Mary Avenue,
    Burnaby, BC

    to be notified;
    hon. Peter Julian, My MP NewWestminster/Burnaby
    Teck Resources
    Calgary Herald
    Indigenous Climate Action

Leave a Reply

Send this to a friend