Can John Horgan’s new B.C. government really stop Kinder Morgan?

Answer: yes. It’s a time to be hopeful — but not to let up the pressure.

The incoming BC NDP government will be appointing their cabinet next week and can finally get to work on the ambitious promises they made in their historic agreement with the BC Greens.

Of particular interest, and much debate, is their promise on a certain Texas tanker proposal to:

“Immediately employ every tool available to the new government to stop the expansion of the Kinder Morgan pipeline, the seven-fold increase in tanker traffic on our coast, and the transportation of raw bitumen through our province.”

So, what can a new B.C. government actually do to stop this project?

The Province has not only the power but the legal responsibility to:

  • conduct its own reviews of pipeline projects through the province, and
  • respect the constitutional rights of First Nations.

Christy Clark’s BC Liberal government screwed up on both counts. John Horgan’s Green-backed NDP government has the opportunity to set things right.

How did we get here in B.C.?

In January, Clark’s BC Liberals approved Kinder Morgan after taking more than $771,000 from the project’s oil patch backers. But there were more problems with this approval than shady donations.

First, Clark’s government didn’t put the project through a rigorous provincial environmental review. The failings of the federal process were well-documented. Then, rather than picking up the slack, B.C. practically copy-and-pasted the Harper-era National Energy Board analysis before handing over a B.C. Environmental Assessment Certificate to the BC Liberals’ oil industry donors.

Next, they failed to uphold Clark’s famous five conditions. “Legal requirements regarding Aboriginal and treaty rights are met”? Nope. The ongoing court cases are proof.

Yet still, the approval was issued. Clark’s “caretaker” cabinet could even have been signing off on provincial pipeline permits during the past couple of months. And now Kinder Morgan has filed their proposed construction schedule, revving up to bring the bulldozers into B.C. this September.

It all puts Horgan’s new government in a tough spot. Fortunately, there are some wicked smart folks on the No Tankers team already mapping out a plan for him.

Three top “tools”

Staff counsels at West Coast Environmental Law published a “Toolbox to Defend B.C.” last month, outlining legal strategies the new government could employ. Here are some highlights:

First, the B.C. government can take a look at the Squamish Nation’s provincial court case. Though most Indigenous legal challenges are against the federal government’s Kinder Morgan approval, Squamish stepped up to challenge B.C. too.

As soon as B.C.’s new Attorney General sits down at their desk, they could start putting into practice the new government’s commitment to the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. If Squamish and British Columbia agree that the provincial consultation was inadequate, the courts could act quickly to resolve the case — potentially cancelling the provincial Environmental Assessment Certificate and prevent any further provincial permitting.

Second, cabinet can issue an order under the Environment and Land Use Act adding new conditions for Kinder Morgan’s project, such as Free Prior and Informed Consent. This order could cancel existing provincial permits and stop future permitting unless the new conditions are met. It’s an immediate tool that could stop construction from proceeding this fall.

Third — once ongoing provincial permitting has been halted — the new B.C. government can put Kinder Morgan through the credible review process we were originally denied under the federal and initial provincial approvals.

To be clear, I am not suggesting a new B.C. Environmental Assessment under the existing process. The NDP-Green Confidence and Supply Motion commits to “revitalize” and “address failures” in this very process. Kinder Morgan’s pipeline and tanker proposal should receive a credible B.C. review of health, safety, drinking water and more — not another rushed, flawed assessment.

What comes next

At this point, the chorus will pipe in… “but Ottawa already made the decision on Kinder Morgan!”

It’s true, interprovincial pipelines are an area of overlapping jurisdiction. Justin Trudeau could try to claim supremacy and force this pipeline through unceded First Nations territory and the province of British Columbia without consent.

But in doing so, he would certainly be saying goodbye for good to “sunny ways” — not to mention a new “nation-to-nation relationship with Indigenous Peoples.” We all saw how that turned out for previous pipeline-pushing Prime Ministers.

The good folks at West Coast Environmental Law put it best, so I’ll leave the last word to them:

“The potential of a future legal challenge, which may not occur, should not discourage B.C. from taking principled steps to safeguard matters squarely within provincial jurisdiction…

“It’s time for B.C. to hit the ‘pause’ button on Kinder Morgan, uphold its obligations to Indigenous peoples, and properly assess the project’s impacts – before it’s too late.”

Want to dig deeper?

Read the legal brief from West Coast Environmental Law: “A Toolbox to Defend B.C.”


13 Responses to “Can John Horgan’s new B.C. government really stop Kinder Morgan?”

  1. earlrichards says:

    Kinder Morgan can keep their pipeline, but Messrs. Weaver and Horgan have to get a law passed, that bans the importation of the dirty, tar sands into beautiful British Columbia.

  2. thomburl says:

    Thank you, there are other, better last words, although West Coast Environmental Law made a start, and Earl’s comment is interesting:
    ” B.C. can hit the ‘STOP’ button on Kinder Morgan, uphold its obligations to Indigenous peoples, and based on a complete assessment of the project’s impacts – reach the only realistic conclusion before it’s too late. ”

    Business and Life on the planet is here:

    MINNEAPOLIS — A new report from the University of Minnesota’s Energy Transition Lab shows adding energy storage is becoming a cost effective way to meet electricity demand in the state.

  3. Gerry LeClaire says:

    Don’t stop you can do it John stop that Kinder Morgan pipe line I am on your side.

  4. Gerry LeClaire says:

    Good luck John.

  5. david wiseman says:

    I am very glad to hear these thoughts I completely agree This is why I became coordinator for Dogwood on Hornby Island. I expect the new govt to carry out their commitment on this issue I also agree with the other goals they announced We all need good governance David Wiseman

    • Lisa Sammartino says:

      Thanks for your support! Happy to hear from Dogwood’s amazing, dedicated volunteers! – Lisa

  6. Alan James says:

    BC also need to make sure the old, leaky pipeline is decommissioned quickly before more ruptures occur.

  7. Adolf Hungrywolf says:

    Can we stop it?
    YES, we can!!!!

  8. Alberta should refine oil sands oil in Alberta so that the hazardous and toxic chemicals are eliminated , then it would be safer to be shipped through pipelines.

  9. Lois Eaton says:

    I think it is most helpful for West Coast Environmental Law and organizations such as yourself to assist our new government in the big job ahead. There are many critical and forgotten areas of need in our province. Doing background digging in specific areas and then presenting it in a coherent manner is great.
    I fear the financial tangle our new government will be inheriting. Is there money, or isn’t there. What big camouflaged pockets is it hiding in if it is there. Which of our environmental and social responsibility projects need immediate work without getting everyone in the province upset that the NDP is on a predictable, drunken spending spree.
    All of this within the crisis of BC on Fire!
    So please keep helping with useful research into the legal, financial, environmental and social needs so the government can piggyback on your initial work.

  10. Warren Walker says:

    One more thing Horgan and Weaver can do is require a DOUBLE HULLED PIPELINE… we required double hulled tankers after the Exxon Valdez disaster.

    That could throw a very expensive spanner in the works.

    The Canadian Constitution was written 150 years before the oil industry was invented and industry is relying on outdated laws to help them through.

  11. Ron Craven says:

    Interesting comment. I hope you have sent your idea to the NDP AND the Greens for consideration.

  12. Tim Dunne says:

    I have enjoyed reading your article. I am struck by the problem of the alternative to pipelines…..rail. Rail traffic does not need approvals, its already there. Its also higher risk to my knowledge. ( have a look in the Fraser canyon). If we as a society live on this planet are we not responsible for the realities of our actions? Using less oil makes sense in the long term – we are making progress there and need to make more. But in the mean time are we not obliged to make the best choices for the environment ? Not as clear as we all think. Disclaimer: I have no connection to pipelines, the oil industry, environmental groups, etc and participate out of a sense of balance and dedication to environmental responsibility…..

Leave a Reply

Send this to a friend